Allia HealthTransparency Data

Methodology

How we collect, process, and present behavioral health rate data.

Data Sources

All rates come from public Transparency in Coverage (TiC) machine-readable files published by commercial payers. These files contain negotiated in-network contracted rates.

We focus this tracker on behavioral health codes and the payer plans currently included in our coverage set.

Why this data is complex

  • Each payer can include many plans, and each plan can publish a large set of MRF files.
  • A single payer can therefore produce hundreds of files that need to be parsed and standardized before rates are comparable.
  • Contract structures also vary by group: national, state-specific, or a mix of both.

How we summarize rates

  1. We ingest and parse all available in-network rate files for covered payer plans.
  2. We extract behavioral health service codes and normalize values into a common dashboard dataset.
  3. We show the median rate for each payer × group × code × state slice to reduce outlier noise.

In short: this page does not show one-off claims, it shows median contracted rates from public payer disclosures.

How to read national vs state views

  • Some groups are represented mainly by national contracts (rates look similar across states).
  • Some groups are represented by state-specific contracts (rates can differ materially by state).
  • Some groups have both patterns, so state filters can change what you see.

Group notes (high-level MRF appearance)

Alma

Often appears with a national contract pattern, with separate state-specific entries in some files (especially New York).

Headway

Usually appears as state-level entities, so rates are commonly state-specific rather than one national rollup.

Grow Therapy

Appears as a mix: national-style coverage in many places plus specific state contracts in select markets.

Talkiatry

Commonly shows a national default pattern with additional state-specific contract entries in some states.

Talkspace

Most often appears as a single national contracting entity in payer files.

Cerebral

Primarily appears as a national contracting entity across the major payer file sets we process.

SonderMind

Typically appears as a national network entity, with rates that often behave like all-state contracts.

LifeStance Health

More state-by-state structure, where local entities are common and national rollup assumptions are limited.

Rula

Expected to appear as a national structure when present; coverage is expanding as additional payer files are processed.